Compare candidates without losing the evidence behind them.

Bring a captured research result into one decision workspace, compare candidates side by side, keep methods, warnings and provenance visible, and record a transparent research rationale before reporting.

Inspect→Compare→Decide→Report

Research-use scope. Phase 21 records a researcher’s comparison and rationale. It does not automatically choose a “best” candidate, establish experimental performance, make a clinical decision, or replace independent validation.

1 · Research context

Load the active workflow context

Use the current browser research snapshot, import a snapshot JSON, or load the clearly labeled teaching example.

Project—

Target / identity—

Snapshot updated—

ModeActive research snapshot

Candidate source Only captured result types with comparable candidate records are listed.

Loading active research snapshot…

2 · Candidate review

Filter, sort and select candidates to compare

Sorting changes display order only. Phase 21 does not convert a score into an automatic recommendation.

Compare	Candidate	Type	Primary sequence / construct	Source score	Key metrics	Warnings

0 candidates

3 · Side-by-side comparison

Keep differences, warnings and provenance visible

Select up to three candidates. Empty or unavailable fields remain explicit rather than being silently inferred.

Select candidates from the table above to build a side-by-side comparison.

4 · Methods & provenance

Record what produced the candidates

Phase 21 shows only provenance present in the captured result. Missing version or database information is labeled as not supplied.

5 · Research decision record

Document the researcher’s choice and rationale

The decision is stored only after confirmation. It remains a research-planning record, not experimental validation.

Candidate carried forward

Decision status

Scientific rationale 0/4000 characters · minimum 20 characters for saving

Confirmation before saving I reviewed the recorded warnings and limitations for the selected candidate. I understand this is a research-planning record and not experimental or clinical validation.

No Phase 21 decision has been saved in this session.

WHY THIS MATTERS

A score is one input to a decision, not the decision itself.

Candidate ranking can help organize review, but a defensible research choice also depends on the biological target, assumptions, methods, warnings, evidence scope and what must still be validated experimentally. Phase 21 keeps those elements visible when a candidate is carried forward.